[[project @ 2005-01-12 06:01:01 by unknown_lamer]
unknown_lamer**20050112060101
 BotConfig fully implemented, set_config_value that takes one t_value
 instead of a t_value_list has been added for convinience
] {
hunk ./ChangeLog 2
+
+	* source/BotConfig.C (read_config): Made to use set_option_value
+	instead of manipulating options_db directly
+
+	* source/BotConfig.H (class BotConfig): Add set_option_value that
+	takes a t_value instead of t_value_list (most uss of
+	set_option_value will be to add a single value so this is very useful)
+
+	* source/BotConfig.C (set_option_value): Implemented
hunk ./source/BotConfig.C 59
-      // This is broken because overwrites existing values
hunk ./source/BotConfig.C 63
-      options_db[command] = t_option_values (t_value_list (), 
-					     t_watcher_list ());
-      options_db[command].first.push_back (params.rest ());
+      set_option_value (command, params.rest (), true);
hunk ./source/BotConfig.C 130
+  key = Utils::to_upper (key); // keys are case insensitive
hunk ./source/BotConfig.C 151
+
+void
+BotConfig::set_option_value (std::string key, t_value value, bool append)
+{
+  t_value_list value_list = t_value_list ();
+  value_list.push_front (value);
+
+  set_option_value (key, value_list, append);
+}
hunk ./source/BotConfig.H 64
-  
+  // Convinience proc
+  void set_option_value (std::string key, t_value value, bool append);
}